The debate saw familiar arguments used for and against the proposal: Crypto is an environmental disaster, reputational risk from being seen to approve of ecological destruction and endorsing the crypto community; against claims that proof of stake would fix the environmental concerns and fiat money isn’t completely green either, and crypto is safer for anonymous use. During the debate, the foundation said in its prior fiscal year, cryptocurrency made up only 0.08% of revenue totalling $130,101, with 347 donors using that payment method, mostly in bitcoin. When the 400 votes were cast, the result was 232 in favour of the ban against 94 against. Over the weekend, Wikimedia Foundation chief advancement officer Lisa Seitz-Gruwell posted the foundation’s response. “The Wikimedia Foundation has decided to discontinue direct acceptance of cryptocurrency as a means of donating,” Seitz-Gruwell said.
“We are making this decision based on recent feedback from those same communities. Specifically, we will be closing our Bitpay account, which will remove our ability to directly accept cryptocurrency as a method of donating.” Seitz-Gruwell added that the foundation would continue to monitor the evolving issue, and the foundation would be “flexible and responsive to the needs of volunteers and donors”.

LemonDuck botnet plunders Docker cloud instances in cryptocurrency crime waveCryptocurrency has overtaken bank transfers for payments into investment scams: ACCCTurkey seeks 40,000-year sentences for alleged cryptocurrency exit scammersUkraine asks cryptocurrency firms to block Russian usersRussia’s attack on Ukraine has sent cryptocurrency prices tumbling